- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2025 16:08:15 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Another option, perhaps, better, is to have a `corners` shorthand: ``` <<corner-shape-and-size>> = none | [ <<corner-shape-value>> && <<length-percentage [0,∞]>>{1,2} ] <<corners>>: <<shape-and-size>> [ / <<corner-shape-and-size>> ]{0, 3} ``` Where the author has to specify both a shape and a size (neither are optional), but can declare 1..4 corners. e.g.: ```css corners: bevel 10px / round 20% 30px / none / squircle 3px; ``` This way, authors can be sure that the radius they provide is attached to a particular shape and doesn't individually fall back to border-radius. -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11623#issuecomment-2931418925 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 2 June 2025 16:08:15 UTC