- From: Christopher Cameron via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 11:39:05 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Would `no-limit` rather than `none` make it clearer? To add to the menu of options: A: `none`, `constrained`, `standard` B: `no-limit`, `constrained`, `limit-to-standard` C: `no-limit`, `limited`, `limit-to-standard` The `no-limit` does sound like something from Rounders... > Or is it repeating a mistake we made with `background-repeat: no-repeat`? That seems fine to me (I wouldn't call it a mistake). O(1) other thing was the discussion about what elements this applies to. I advocate this apply to everything. For image and video it has a clear meaning. For canvas it will soon (there is work to make that mirror the non-gainmap HDR images). For CSS colors, I think it will be liberating to impose the constraint that HDR-ness will be headroom parameterized and will default to SDR in some scheme approximating [this](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11616). -- GitHub Notification of comment by ccameron-chromium Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11558#issuecomment-2627002190 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 31 January 2025 11:39:06 UTC