- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 13:58:20 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> > Change everywhere that says `border-radius` to `corner`, which would resolve to `[ border-radius && <<corner-shape-value>>?]`. > > I assume you mean `[ <'border-radius'> && <corner-shape-value>? ]`, right? Yes > > > ``` > > corner [to | by] [position/coordinates etc.] [ <<corner-shape-value>> || [rotate <<angle>>] || [cw | ccw]] > > ``` > > In CSS we generally refrain from having abbreviations, so I'd vote for using `clockwise` and `counterclockwise` as keywords. We use `cw` and `ccw` inside `shape()` already for arcs. > > So, writing the whole syntax out, I guess this should be > > <corner-command> = corner > [ <corner-shape-value> || rotate <angle> || [ clockwise | counterclockwise ] ] > [ [ to <position> ] > | [ by <coordinate-pair> ] ] > Sebastian Something like this, yes. -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11620#issuecomment-3206484494 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2025 13:58:21 UTC