- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 09:40:25 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Change everywhere that says `border-radius` to `corner`, which would resolve to `[ border-radius && <<corner-shape-value>>?]`. I assume you mean `[ <'border-radius'> && <corner-shape-value>? ]`, right? > ``` > corner [to | by] [position/coordinates etc.] [ <<corner-shape-value>> || [rotate <<angle>>] || [cw | ccw]] > ``` In CSS we generally refrain from having abbreviations, so I'd vote for using `clockwise` and `counterclockwise` as keywords. So, writing the whole syntax out, I guess this should be ```ebnf <corner-command> = corner [ <corner-shape-value> || rotate <angle> || [ clockwise | counterclockwise ] ] [ [ to <position> ] | [ by <coordinate-pair> ] ] ``` Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11620#issuecomment-3205203792 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2025 09:40:26 UTC