- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 09:40:25 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Change everywhere that says `border-radius` to `corner`, which would resolve to `[ border-radius && <<corner-shape-value>>?]`.
I assume you mean `[ <'border-radius'> && <corner-shape-value>? ]`, right?
> ```
> corner [to | by] [position/coordinates etc.] [ <<corner-shape-value>> || [rotate <<angle>>] || [cw | ccw]]
> ```
In CSS we generally refrain from having abbreviations, so I'd vote for using `clockwise` and `counterclockwise` as keywords.
So, writing the whole syntax out, I guess this should be
```ebnf
<corner-command> = corner
[ <corner-shape-value> || rotate <angle> || [ clockwise | counterclockwise ] ]
[ [ to <position> ]
| [ by <coordinate-pair> ] ]
```
Sebastian
--
GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11620#issuecomment-3205203792 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2025 09:40:26 UTC