- From: Anne van Kesteren via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 10:28:03 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I see. Nobody replied to my question at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5079#issuecomment-2572549032 other than a vague hint that the concern was indeed correct. If it's incorrect and the feature indeed always matches the algorithm HTML follows, including when a style sheet is used by multiple documents and such, there might be less of an issue. Is there test coverage for that? However, it's probably still a bad idea as a serialized URL doesn't work well internationally. It's always in ASCII so IDNA domain names become Punycode, Unicode paths become percent-encoded gibberish. Unless much more work is done (including work user agents have thus far opposed), it seems like the feature would be far too Western-centric to include. -- GitHub Notification of comment by annevk Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5079#issuecomment-2796513955 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 11 April 2025 10:28:03 UTC