Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade-7] CSS @sheet - is there a need for an @sheet statement (in addition to block)? (#11998)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-cascade-7] CSS @sheet - is there a need for an @sheet statement (in addition to block)?`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: bare @sheet statements are invalid; the following block is always required`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;emeyer> kurt: Another divergence from @layer: you can have a statement without any rules<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> q+<br>
&lt;astearns> ack TabAtkins<br>
&lt;emeyer> …The difference is that in @sheet, there are no explicit priorities<br>
&lt;emeyer> TabAtkins: I agree<br>
&lt;emeyer> …The @layer is a completely different construct that just has a similar pattern<br>
&lt;emeyer> …If you need an empty sheet, just put empty braces after it<br>
&lt;emeyer> astearns: If the only purpose is avoid writing open-close brackets, that’s not worth the effort<br>
&lt;emeyer> TabAtkins: Right<br>
&lt;emeyer> astearns: Proposed resolution is that bare @sheet statements are invalid; block is always required<br>
&lt;emeyer> RESOLVED: bare @sheet statements are invalid; the following block is always required<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11998#issuecomment-2775889119 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 3 April 2025 13:58:49 UTC