- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2025 13:56:02 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-cascade-7] Should anonymous @sheets be explicitly disallowed?`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Require a name for every @sheet` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <emeyer> kurt: You can have anonymous layers, but for sheets, rules don’t apply until they’re imported but you can’t import an anonymous sheet<br> <emeyer> …So I think we should disallow that<br> <emeyer> TabAtkins: Agreed<br> <bramus> +1<br> <emeyer> astearns: Any reason someone might want to set up a bunch of sheets and then add a name later?<br> <emeyer> TabAtkins: No<br> <emeyer> …We’d have to make the rule mutable, and we aren’t consistent about that<br> <emeyer> …Worst case, you can put in a dummy name<br> <emeyer> kurt: If a sheet could have wildcards, maybe, but we don’t<br> <emeyer> kbabbitt: It does imply that when we write the CSSOM, the sheet name should be immutable<br> <emeyer> TabAtkins: We could make it mutable but a DOM string, but I don’t think there’s a great reason to make it mutable<br> <emeyer> astearns: Proposed resolution is to require a name for every @sheet rule<br> <emeyer> …Objections?<br> <emeyer> (none)<br> <emeyer> RESOLVED: Require a name for every @sheet<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12000#issuecomment-2775878685 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2025 13:56:03 UTC