- From: James Stuckey Weber via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 18:31:58 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> The proposal (as I understand it) would mean the same geometry for both examples (left/right/etc tracking having zero size). Ah sorry, I was incorrect, and you are correct on this. > So I think you are asking for the anchored element to escape the default containing-block Isn't this already the behavior? If it gets placed within a position grid row or column with a zero size, the positioned element doesn't get clipped. > A potential solution might be to allow abspos to skip containing blocks where there isn't a viable anchor within scope for example. Interesting- so potentially, if an abspos element with a default anchor can't find an anchor within its containing block, it would look higher in the tree to find a containing block, and then its parent would become a valid anchor as a descendant of the altered containing block? This could provide better behavior potentially, although I'm hesitant to introduce more complexity into the containing block algorithm. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jamesnw Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11769#issuecomment-2770352447 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 1 April 2025 18:31:58 UTC