- From: James Stuckey Weber via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 13:56:24 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> At first glance this is a little confusing to me IMO - and typically would give poor results. E.g. all of the top/left/etc tracks would have a zero size in most cases, and typically a containing block above would give a better result. Is this in regards to using `position-area`? You're correct that this would be the case in the second example, which shows what is currently possible. If you use `position-area` in the second example that has `inset: 0`, then the positioned element would be relying on overflow handling, and would be completely outside the generated containing block. This proposal would fix that- the new containing block for the positioned element would be generated by the parent `div`'s containing block, which very well could be larger than the parent itself. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jamesnw Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11769#issuecomment-2769450254 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 1 April 2025 13:56:25 UTC