- From: Kevin Babbitt via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 21:06:48 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I think making `::before` and `:after` part-like means that `::before::before` should work. Supporting potentially infinite levels of `::before`/`::after` seems like it might be problematic. (Though maybe not?) FWIW, the spec currently states this is invalid. https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors-4/#sub-pseudo-elements: > Unless the corresponding [sub-pseudo-element](https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors-4/#sub-pseudo-element) is explicitly defined to exist in another specification, pseudo-element selectors are not valid when compounded to another pseudo-element selector. So, for example, ::before::before is an invalid selector, but ::before::marker is valid (in implementations that support the ::before::marker sub-pseudo-element). -- GitHub Notification of comment by kbabbitt Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10846#issuecomment-2380060043 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 27 September 2024 21:06:49 UTC