- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 22:44:40 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-pseudo] Should ::before / ::after really be part-like?`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: ::before and ::after are not ::part-like but are tree-abiding` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <dholbert> dbaron: this is a subtopic of previous one. emilio filed a specific issue about ::Before and ::after<br> <dholbert> dbaron: I agree with him, that ::before and after are not part-like<br> <kbabbitt> +1<br> <dholbert> fantasai: right, it surprised me to find that in the spec<br> <dholbert> emilio: sounds good<br> <andreubotella> +1<br> <dholbert> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: ::before and ::after are not ::part-like<br> <kbabbitt> q+<br> <flackr> +1<br> <Rossen6> ack flackr<br> <Rossen6> ack fantasai<br> <Rossen6> ack kbabbitt<br> <dholbert> kbabbitt: but they are tree-abiding?<br> <dholbert> emilio: right<br> <dholbert> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: ::before and ::after are not ::part-like but are tree-abiding<br> <dholbert> RESOLVED: ::before and ::after are not ::part-like but are tree-abiding<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10846#issuecomment-2380243508 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 27 September 2024 22:44:41 UTC