Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudo] Should ::before / ::after really be part-like? (#10846)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-pseudo] Should ::before / ::after really be part-like?`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: ::before and ::after are not ::part-like but are tree-abiding`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dholbert> dbaron: this is a subtopic of previous one. emilio filed a specific issue about ::Before and ::after<br>
&lt;dholbert> dbaron: I agree with him, that ::before and after are not part-like<br>
&lt;kbabbitt> +1<br>
&lt;dholbert> fantasai: right, it surprised me to find that in the spec<br>
&lt;dholbert> emilio: sounds good<br>
&lt;andreubotella> +1<br>
&lt;dholbert> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: ::before and ::after are not ::part-like<br>
&lt;kbabbitt> q+<br>
&lt;flackr> +1<br>
&lt;Rossen6> ack flackr<br>
&lt;Rossen6> ack fantasai<br>
&lt;Rossen6> ack kbabbitt<br>
&lt;dholbert> kbabbitt: but they are tree-abiding?<br>
&lt;dholbert> emilio: right<br>
&lt;dholbert> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: ::before and ::after are not ::part-like but are tree-abiding<br>
&lt;dholbert> RESOLVED: ::before and ::after are not ::part-like but are tree-abiding<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10846#issuecomment-2380243508 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 27 September 2024 22:44:41 UTC