- From: dshin-moz via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 13:51:36 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
So `left: anchor(/* 1 */, anchor(/* 2 */))` would be different from ``` .anchored { left: anchor(/* 1 */); position-try-fallbacks: --fb; } @position-try --fb { left: anchor(/* 2 */); } ``` The recursive fallback case will pick the option 1 so long as it's referring to a valid anchor, regardless of the absolute containing block overflowing, where the `@position-try` case will try option 2 if option 1 overflows the absolute containing block. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dshin-moz Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10831#issuecomment-2377039523 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2024 13:51:37 UTC