Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position] `anchor()` Fallback type inconsistency vs WPT (#10831)

So `left: anchor(/* 1 */, anchor(/* 2 */))` would be different from

```
.anchored {
  left: anchor(/* 1 */);
  position-try-fallbacks: --fb;
}

@position-try --fb {
  left: anchor(/* 2 */);
}
```

The recursive fallback case will pick the option 1 so long as it's referring to a valid anchor, regardless of the absolute containing block overflowing, where the `@position-try` case will try option 2 if option 1 overflows the absolute containing block.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by dshin-moz
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10831#issuecomment-2377039523 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 26 September 2024 13:51:37 UTC