- From: dshin-moz via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 19:56:15 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
dshin-moz has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-anchor-position] `anchor()` Fallback type inconsistency vs WPT == For the `anchor()` function's optional fallback value, the [spec text](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#anchor-pos) specifies `<length-percentage>`, but the corresponding WPT, `anchor-parse-valid.html`, [considers](https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/master/css/css-anchor-position/anchor-parse-valid.html#L46) the use of `anchor()` function itself to be valid, seemingly contradicting the spec text. It seems to me that both the spec and the test were initially committed this way - Which one is correct? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10831 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2024 19:56:16 UTC