- From: andruud via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 16:42:33 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@tabatkins I don't think that makes sense. - A `@scope` rule selects a specific element to become the scoping root. - A `CSSNestedDeclarations` rule within `@scope` then matches that scoping root with zero specificity, (equivalent to :where(:scope)). https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10431 - Pseudo-elements can't be scoping roots, and I don't think we should change that. https://drafts.csswg.org/css-cascade-6/#scope-syntax. It is a separate issue in any case. So I think `&` is fine here. -- GitHub Notification of comment by andruud Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10497#issuecomment-2358952069 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 18 September 2024 16:42:34 UTC