- From: Lucas via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 07:46:45 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Conceptually, this specific layout is still some kind of a grid, so it makes sense to keep it as a sub-functionality of `display: grid`. It also aligns better with the story of `subgrid` as another keyword to use for `grid-template-row/column`. I am worried about the adoption of a new display type when there are still people not interested in learning grid. It would be another syntax to learn, which is only somewhat close to the grid syntax. I vote for the grid-integrated syntax -- GitHub Notification of comment by copyandpaetow Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11060#issuecomment-2428508361 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2024 07:46:45 UTC