- From: Marius Gundersen via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 05:43:17 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
There is so much overlap between grid and masonry that it feels really strange to duplicate all that syntax. I also don't think masonry is going to be used all that much in the real world (once Pinterest design becomes easy it will also become untrendy) so having an entire set of keywords dedicated to it feels like a pollution of keywords. I'm not sure the defaults for masonry syntax advocated by the Chrome team is very useful either, given that it will often need to be overriden or be redeclared just to be explicit. The only downside I see for integrated grid syntax is that new features of grid need to take masonry into consideration. I don't know what is in the pipeline for grid so I don't know how much of an issue that actually is. Given all of this I vote for the grid integrated syntax -- GitHub Notification of comment by mariusGundersen Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11060#issuecomment-2428307816 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2024 05:43:18 UTC