- From: Lea Verou via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 16:16:44 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I think I prefer `@some-weird-name` to `@group`, because if authors somehow _do_ find a use for it that is different or more specific than grouping or nesting, we can replace/alias the weird name with something more closely matching the discovered use. Not sure about getting stuck with `@some-weird-name` for time immemorial though. I think `@group` is sufficiently generic that it can work decently with any use. -- GitHub Notification of comment by LeaVerou Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10234#issuecomment-2137797526 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2024 16:16:45 UTC