- From: vmpstr via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 14:30:25 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I lean strongly towards not requiring `view-transition-tree` Can you elaborate on the reasons? Requiring `view-transition-tree` would indeed closer align with the containing block models found elsewhere. Typically it is the properties of an element that make it a containing block, not the fact that a descendant references it in some property. It is also somewhat strange to me that this element would only nest the referenced element, and not the rest of its descendants (unless also explicitly named). Are there any other CSS concepts that align closer to this? For some reason I'm thinking of anchor positioning, but even there, I don't think there's this type of effect -- GitHub Notification of comment by vmpstr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10334#issuecomment-2122772668 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2024 14:30:26 UTC