- From: vmpstr via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 15:31:41 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The proposal is to keep it in the structure where it appeared in the old state. So if both `container-1` and `container-2` are `view-transition-tree: preserve`, then the ultimate structure is something like the following:
```css
::view-transition
|__ ::view-transition-group(root)
|__ ::view-transition-group(container-1)
|__ ::view-transition-group(card1)
|__ ::view-transition-group(card2)
|__ ::view-transition-group(container-2)
```
In other words, even though the card moved in the "new state", in the "old state" it's still a part of `container-1`.
--
GitHub Notification of comment by vmpstr
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10334#issuecomment-2115559639 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2024 15:31:42 UTC