- From: vmpstr via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 15:31:41 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The proposal is to keep it in the structure where it appeared in the old state. So if both `container-1` and `container-2` are `view-transition-tree: preserve`, then the ultimate structure is something like the following: ```css ::view-transition |__ ::view-transition-group(root) |__ ::view-transition-group(container-1) |__ ::view-transition-group(card1) |__ ::view-transition-group(card2) |__ ::view-transition-group(container-2) ``` In other words, even though the card moved in the "new state", in the "old state" it's still a part of `container-1`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by vmpstr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10334#issuecomment-2115559639 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2024 15:31:42 UTC