- From: Khushal Sagar via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 15:51:06 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> The other way around, no? Yup. Sorry, fixed the comment above. > If card-1 is moved to container-2, where will ::view-transition-group(card-1) What @vmpstr said. In the case above, you want `card-1` to be under `::view-transition` directly right? So I think this example would work with `view-transition-parent` + the approach to use old state parent names (if provided). -- GitHub Notification of comment by khushalsagar Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10334#issuecomment-2115605890 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2024 15:51:07 UTC