- From: Jake Archibald via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 09:51:09 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@khushalsagar @vmpstr > FWIW, I prefer keeping the old dom structure. I don't think I fully understand what's being proposed here. In this example: ```html <div class="container-1"> <div class="card" style="view-transition-name: card-1"></div> <div class="card" style="view-transition-name: card-2"></div> <div class="card" style="view-transition-name: card-3"></div> <div class="card" style="view-transition-name: card-4"></div> </div> <div class="container-2"></div> ``` And the CSS for the transition: ```css .container-1 { view-transition-name: container-1; view-transition-tree: preserve; } html::view-transition-group(container-1) { overflow: clip; } ``` If `card-1` is moved to `container-2`, where will `::view-transition-group(card-1)` be nested? -- GitHub Notification of comment by jakearchibald Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10334#issuecomment-2114735413 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2024 09:51:10 UTC