- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 16:35:49 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-anchor-position] Default alignments for inset areas are wrong`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: If inset-area spans both of the tracks we'll align toward the missing track instead of centering` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <emilio> fantasai: initial value for align/justify-self is normal<br> <emilio> ... generally depends on context to an appropriate behavior<br> <emilio> ... for inset-area we try to make the default alignment for the area useful<br> <emilio> ... so if you're in the center track we center<br> <emilio> ... if you're on the edge we align toward the area<br> <emilio> ... if you're spanning into two tracks<br> <emilio> ... and there the default is anchor-center, but that's generally not what you want<br> <kizu> q+<br> <emilio> ... the usual thing is to align towards the track you're excluding<br> <emilio> ... it's easy to center if needed<br> <TabAtkins> q+<br> <astearns> ack kizu<br> <emilio> kizu: tested r/n, I think it works well when the anchor is smaller than the positioned element<br> <emilio> ... when the anchor is bigger it looks better with anchor-center<br> <emilio> fantasai: typically in that case you keep aligned to one edge and overflow<br> <emilio> kizu: can we define anchor-center to try not to shrink to the center area<br> <emilio> ... only if it's not fitting shifted it'd work better<br> <emilio> TabAtkins: tracked on a different issue<br> <emilio> ... not on the agenda this week<br> <astearns> ack TabAtkins<br> <emilio> kizu: no objection then<br> <emilio> TabAtkins: no objection from us either<br> <emilio> ... what kizu described was the originally what I wanted<br> <emilio> ... but I deferred the shifting<br> <emilio> ... because I wanted to fix it more generally<br> <emilio> ... so tldr agree with the change<br> <emilio> ... also our impl actually matches that resolution because engineers misread the conditions<br> <emilio> PROPOSED: If inset-area spans both of the tracks we'll align toward the missing track instead of centering<br> <emilio> RESOLVED: If inset-area spans both of the tracks we'll align toward the missing track instead of centering<br> <TabAtkins> s/both of the/two/<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10313#issuecomment-2112996339 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2024 16:35:50 UTC