- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 16:29:01 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed ``[css-anchor-position] Initial value of `position-anchor` should be `auto` not `implicit` ``, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Rename implicit to auto in position-anchor` * `RESOLVED: Drop the keyword from the anchor() function` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <bradk> present*<br> <emilio> fantasai: The initial value of `position-anchor` is `implicit`<br> <emilio> ... advanced vocabulary, but we probably don't want to expose this to authors<br> <emilio> ... propose to rename `implicit` to `auto`<br> <emilio> ... and then this keyword also shows up in `anchor()` where we can rename it to `auto` too or just drop it because I don't think it's necessary<br> <emilio> TabAtkins: we should just drop it, if you omit it you get that behavior<br> <emilio> ... I generally want to make sure that implicit behavior is specifiable, but not necessary<br> <emilio> florian: seems more consistent to how we name things<br> <emilio> RESOLVED: Rename implicit to auto in position-anchor<br> <emilio> RESOLVED: Drop the keyword from the anchor() function<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10312#issuecomment-2112984254 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2024 16:29:02 UTC