Re: [csswg-drafts] Alternate masonry path forward (#9041)

I do wonder if there's any best-of-both approach here? But I don't know what that would look like. Just thinking: `gap` works in both `flexbox` and `grid` display values. Are there more properties that could be shared across `grid` and `masonry` displays? Or, as per @phaux, useful ways for the two layouts to relate to each other?

I get the complexity of properties working slightly different in different contexts, but it also feels real awkward having nearly-identical properties with nearly-identical syntax, but no interop. I'm not convinced that's actually "more clear" for authors in any meaningful way.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by mirisuzanne
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9041#issuecomment-2108157365 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Monday, 13 May 2024 16:31:19 UTC