Re: [csswg-drafts] Republishing Tasks Permathread (#6900)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `Republishing Tasks Permathread`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Editorial update to level 3 box rec.`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;keithamus> astearns: 2 publications, 1st one is regular draft. We can always publish WD. You need editorial update to box level 3?<br>
&lt;ChrisL> q+<br>
&lt;fantasai> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-box-3/#changes<br>
&lt;keithamus> fantasai: minor changes. subheadings, some terminology.<br>
&lt;astearns> ack ChrisL<br>
&lt;keithamus> ChrisL: this is a change to rec. Is it purely editorial?<br>
&lt;keithamus> fantasai: yep<br>
&lt;keithamus> ChrisL: in terms of process, proposed correction? EC Review?<br>
&lt;keithamus> fantasai: we can just publish, its just editorial<br>
&lt;keithamus> ChrisL: Okay thanks<br>
&lt;fantasai> -> https://www.w3.org/2023/Process-20231103/#revised-rec-editorial<br>
&lt;ChrisL> s/EC/AC<br>
&lt;keithamus> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Editorial update to level 3 box rec.<br>
&lt;keithamus> RESOLVED: Editorial update to level 3 box rec.<br>
&lt;ChrisL> +1<br>
&lt;keithamus> astearns: for level 4 I'd like to get in practice of using wiki without asking for resolution<br>
&lt;keithamus> astearns: when these 3 were suggested, public WD for level 2 is first. Should we resolve on level 2 or publish the WD and resolve in ED?<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6900#issuecomment-2023164648 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2024 16:12:01 UTC