- From: Khushal Sagar via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 15:43:39 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
khushalsagar has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-view-transitions-1] Should view transition names be tree scoped? == The spec currently traverses all DOM elements to look for view transition names, see text [here](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-view-transitions-1/#capture-old-state-algorithm:~:text=block%20size.-,For%20each%20element%20of%20every%20element%20that%20is%20connected%2C%20and%20has%20a%20node%20document%20equal%20to%20to%20document,-%2C%20in%20paint%20order). This should probably be tree scoped similar to other CSS naming conventions like [scroll timeline](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8135) and I'm guessing anchor positioning (@tabatkins ?). @nt1m fyi. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10145 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2024 15:43:40 UTC