- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 14:13:34 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> An alternative might be to say that in the absence of a fragment identifier, the UA loads the first defined font in the collection. That seems the simplest and easiest option. But the spec should not that this is fragile: the font might get updates such that the "first" font changes. > the WG has in the past specifically opposed selecting fonts by their index in OpenType collections, IIRC that was feedback (when [RFC8081](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8081.html)was being developed) from font vendors, in particular Adobe, who gave examples of updates to in-the-wild collections which had changed the index numbers. -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10127#issuecomment-2020545560 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2024 14:13:35 UTC