Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-syntax-3] `url(` followed by comment(s) (#10125) from Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub on 2024-03-24 (public-css-archive@w3.org from March 2024)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 21:07:29 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-2016943474-1711314448-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

So in conclusion: yes, the spec handles both of these cases and impls are correctly implementing that behavior, and I think that behavior is probably the best overall, given the legacy weirdnesses of `url()` syntax that we have to continue supporting.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10125#issuecomment-2016943474 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Sunday, 24 March 2024 21:07:30 UTC