- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 08:28:32 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> > I tend towards `types`, there is precedent for using plural in descriptors (e.g. @counter-style has a few) > > As this point I was gonna suggest `types` as well. It describes what you are defining _(hinting at possibility to add more than one)_, it’s vague enough to be correct in both CSS and JS land, and it makes it easy for the author to use: the thing is called `types` _(independent of the context)_. > > As you mention `@counter-style` has precedent for having a descriptor that is plural. Another one is [`@font-palette-values`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts/#om-fontpalettevalues)’s [`override-colors`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts/#override-color) I'm ok with this, we went with `type` because of a notion in the TPAC conversation that CSS doesn't use plurals. (I believe @tabatkins & @astearns raised this?) -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10070#issuecomment-1999158754 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 15 March 2024 08:28:33 UTC