- From: Xiaocheng Hu via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 02:59:22 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Consider e.g. Bootstrap Icons. They have over 2000 icons. The mixin approach would add 2000 * 13 = 26,000 characters to their CSS code. In contrast, their base .bi class is 4 declarations… And Font Awesome has even more icons… That's a good argument. I take my opposition back. This is like an inheritance vs. composition debate. Normally I prefer composition, but in CSS verbosity is a much bigger concern, as more code means more network usage. -- GitHub Notification of comment by xiaochengh Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10001#issuecomment-1977866277 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2024 02:59:23 UTC