- From: k via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 21:15:03 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
... To add to the original discussion, even if it's not really clear to me why CSS 2.2 was (still? again?) being discussed as a "new" name in 2018 and 2020, respectively, when that document _from 2016_ was already called that: Am I understanding correctly that there were – or _are_ – plans to continue working on CSS2 under the name CSS 2.1, which is an alias for Revision 1, despite the existence of CSS 2.2 aka Revision 2? Because that sounds like a terrible idea from a versioning standpoint. A follow-up to a version 2.2 would be exptected to be named something like 2.2.x or 2.3 by anyone familiar with versioning. How are people supposed to know that 2.2 should be disregarded and that they need to "go back" to 2.1 when it isn't plastered all over everything to do with 2.2? -- GitHub Notification of comment by keikoro Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4847#issuecomment-1973927827 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 1 March 2024 21:15:04 UTC