- From: Masataka Yakura via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 20:53:14 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
myakura has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [Container Queries] consider keep links to CQ features in contain-3 or redirect them to conditional-5 == With https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/10447 landed, linkes to CQ features in contain-3 no longer works. This breaks bunch of documentations or articles in the wild. I remember there are drafts that keep ids for removed features (e.g. https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors-3/#content-selectors, which has even notes that it's removed ). I wonder if contain-3 could keep such links and perhaps add notes that they've moved to conditional-5, or some client-side redirect from contain-3 to conditional-5 like WHATWG drafts do. What do you think? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10472 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2024 20:53:15 UTC