- From: andruud via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 19:35:00 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> In other specs the current direction is to have these names operate on the flat tree, and scope them using a separate property (e.g. anchor-scope) rather than using the shadow boundary for this scoping. No, anchor positioning is tree-scoped, and there's no plan to change it. I think the issue and proposal in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10325 was just misunderstood. The anchor-scope property does not replace tree-scoping, it's just an additional mechanism on top of it. Scroll-driven animations however is more like what you describe. For some reason I never understood, timeline names are _not_ tree-scoped. https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8135. But I'm not sure we should draw inspiration from this, we might want to fix SDA instead. -- GitHub Notification of comment by andruud Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10145#issuecomment-2207049104 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2024 19:35:01 UTC