Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] Should view transition names be tree scoped? (#10145)

Thanks @andruud, this makes sense. So to clarify, the resolution here is fine and matches anchor positioning, and should also support things like putting a `view-transition-name` on a `::part`, but the way we interpreted it in the implementation (and perhaps in the spec wording?) is a bug.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by noamr
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10145#issuecomment-2207364961 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2024 21:44:35 UTC