- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 21:44:34 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Thanks @andruud, this makes sense. So to clarify, the resolution here is fine and matches anchor positioning, and should also support things like putting a `view-transition-name` on a `::part`, but the way we interpreted it in the implementation (and perhaps in the spec wording?) is a bug. -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10145#issuecomment-2207364961 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2024 21:44:35 UTC