- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:04:01 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
noamr has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-view-transitions-1] [css-view-transitions-2] consider a living-standard model for view-transitions == The delta-spec model has made adding features to css-view-transitions-2 a bit awkward and counterproductive. See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/9773 for example. The more we advance the feature, the more this is likely to make that problem more difficult. Suggesting instead to have a single level for CSS view-transitions, and keep things in an editor draft, moving to /TR/ once they're stable, but without levels. (Is that the model for css-syntax?) We should still be careful about feature-detection, to make sure subfeatures are properly detected (e.g. you don't assume `view-transition-class` is supported just because `view-transition-name` is supported). Alternate proposals for cleaner models also appreciated. /cc @tabatkins @khushalsagar @vmpstr @nt1m Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9850 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 24 January 2024 21:04:03 UTC