Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade] [css-nesting] Figure out whether we're fine with "shifting up" bare declarations after rules (#8738)

I think something like `@nest` could work provided that:
- It gets generated in the background when authors use declarations after rules
- When serializing an `@nest` rule, it gets serialized as bare declarations.

Then essentially it becomes an esoteric implementation detail, that only those doing specialized CSSOM handling need to learn.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by LeaVerou
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8738#issuecomment-1970321463 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 29 February 2024 03:15:37 UTC