- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:20:39 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> > I think the problem with the name `active-view-transition` is the confusion on what actually goes in the argument. > > Something like `:active-view-transition(type: <ident>)` would make this more clear, but I don’t think there’s a precedent in CSS that would allow named arguments in selectors. Can be `:active-view-transition(type slide-in)`, similar to `:nth-child(2 of .class)`. Also would not make sense to require the name if a-v-t only accepts 1 argument over time. > > > A beginner mistake would be to put a view-transition-name instead of the transition `type` for instance. > > These kinds of mistakes on "similar but not quite exact things" are very easy to make by beginners. > > That looks like something for DevRel / documentation to clear up. I tend to agree. It's a mistake that's easy to spot and fix. -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9972#issuecomment-1956435468 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2024 11:20:40 UTC