- From: Bramus via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 08:40:58 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I’m OK with requiring an argument in the pseudo-class. Draws a parallel with the pseudo-elements Don’t like the suggested `view-transition-type` as a name, as that would imply that you _must_ set a type before it can ever match (`*` is not the same as `null`). What about a merger of both? I.e. allowing (requiring) an argument to `:active-view-transition`: - `:active-view-transition(*)` - `:active-view-transition(type)` That would also need some specificity-rules like what we did with the pseudos. - `*` = add 0,0,0 - Anything but `*` = add 0,0,1 -- GitHub Notification of comment by bramus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9972#issuecomment-1956145729 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2024 08:40:59 UTC