- From: Johannes Odland via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 20:30:32 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I stumbled over the same issue and think it would be helpful to clarify this ambiguity in the spec. I have one question regarding the expansion though @cdoublev: If `entry 10%` is consumed by `<'animation-range-start'>`, shouldn't `animation-range: entry 10%` expand to `animation-range-start: entry 10%` and `animation-range-end: entry 100%` due to how animation-range-end is expanded when omitted? > If [<'animation-range-end'>](https://drafts.csswg.org/scroll-animations-1/#propdef-animation-range-end) is omitted and [<'animation-range-start'>](https://drafts.csswg.org/scroll-animations-1/#propdef-animation-range-start) includes a [<timeline-range-name>](https://drafts.csswg.org/scroll-animations-1/#typedef-timeline-range-name) component, then animation-range-end is set to that same <timeline-range-name> and 100%. -- GitHub Notification of comment by johannesodland Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9264#issuecomment-1953124283 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 19 February 2024 20:30:34 UTC