- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:50:20 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I don't think `::root:view-transition-type(*)` is strange, it just means all view transition types. By strange, I mean, if you're not using types, this makes you have to think of types while what you care about is whether there is an active view-transition. This would become more apparent when we enable element-scoped view-transitions, e.g.: ```css #container:active-view-transition { /* enable things for when this container is the scope of the current view transition */ } ``` In the above example you might not care about types at all, so adding the word `type` feels out of place. -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9972#issuecomment-1952868168 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 19 February 2024 16:50:22 UTC