Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Should animations use View Transitions as their backing mechanism? (by default or as an opt-in) (#9945)

> Another desgin that probably works fine is to fade in and fade out the final states without transition between them. Then you do not need to support intermediate designs that do not make a lot of sense, you just fade out the old version, and fade-in the new version. In many cases, that is probably sufficient?

Don’t remember who exactly I was talking to about this, but we came to the same conclusion: might be OK to simply fade out the element at the old position, move it behind the scenes, and fade it in at the new position.

This behavior could potentially be a new keyword for the `position-animation` property, in addition to the _(still tentatively named)_ `magic`.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by bramus
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9945#issuecomment-1946909361 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 15 February 2024 18:38:14 UTC