- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 19:06:59 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-images-4][css-color-5] color-mix() and cross-fade() have different serialization order?`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Make cross-fade() match color-mix() serialization order` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <emilio> scribe+<br> <emilio> chris: we have two things that arguably are similar, but where the syntax is not aligned<br> <emilio> ... one is shipped and interoperable, and the other one is not implemented anywhere<br> <emilio> ... I agree that it should be aligned and I offered to make a PR to align cross-fade() with color-mix()<br> <TabAtkins> +1 from me<br> <emilio> astearns: so proposal is to make cross-fade() match color-mix() serialization<br> <emilio> astearns: objections?<br> <emilio> +1<br> <TabAtkins> my serialization order was fairly arbitrayr, as the first example of this function<br> <emilio> RESOLVED: Make cross-fade() match color-mix() serialization order<br> <emilio> chris: want a PR or should I just edit the spec?<br> <emilio> TabAtkins / fantasai: just edit<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9405#issuecomment-1944429092 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2024 19:07:03 UTC