- From: Adam Argyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 22:23:23 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Reopening: the edit that closed this issue is not backed by a WG resolution. The added wording seems generally reasonable to me (aside from the use of RFC2119 language in a Note). I am less sure about the removal of the inline issue though. thanks Florian, I'm open to advice on how to be work better within the process and spec verbiage, and apologize for any churn adding the note caused. -- GitHub Notification of comment by argyleink Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9475#issuecomment-1935027970 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2024 22:23:25 UTC