- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 20:52:00 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> > > What if things are flatter and all worth 1 (except for *)? > > > > > > This doesn't answer the question of "1 what"? Is it equivalent to 1 class/type/id/something new? > > I discussed this with Adam earlier today and it would be 1 type. > > I think it could actually work: > > * No compat issue with what is currently shipping > > * The ident used in a vt-pseudo now does not suddenly become more specific than a class-on-root selector with no ident > * It’s not complex: just cound the parts in vt‘s compound. The more you count, the more specific you are in selecting the right snapshot. > * Good separation between selecting the root and selecting the snapshots _(the one doesn’t really influence the other)_ OK interesting proposal! A bit hard for me to come to terms with `::view-transition-group(*.class)` having the same speficifity as `::view-transition-group(name)` but perhaps that's ok -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9887#issuecomment-1930731201 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 6 February 2024 20:52:03 UTC