Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] CSS flexibility for `path()`s (and let’s fix paths while we’re at it?) (#9889)

General +1 to [Tab's comment](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9889?fbclid=IwAR1EDCI16zu41BEFTh3z8hIquh5NWp3l2dHF4ibYiq3DvHHeDTGWXnZY4jY#issuecomment-1922418491), also +1 to `longer`/`shorter`, and also +1 that 4 lengths in sequence is a bit hard to parse as two coordinates though I don't know how to solve that nicely. I think it's also interesting to compare the two proposals, both to see where they're the same and where they're different. :) In particular it seems like the arc syntax in `shape()` could use some improvements.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9889#issuecomment-1928835551 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Tuesday, 6 February 2024 05:55:33 UTC