- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 15:42:53 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I am a bit concerned that authors will have a hard time understanding this if this has different rules and weights than regular selectors for things that _look_ similar to regular class, type selectors > > Specificity is already one of the least well understood parts of CSS. They look similar to type selectors just because we didn't add a `#` (perhaps we should have), but for all intents and practical purposes view-transition-names are more similar to IDs than to tag names. -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9887#issuecomment-1924127462 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 2 February 2024 15:42:55 UTC