- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 21:39:33 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@Loirooriol The situation here seems to be a different one. `background-repeat` already has physical based definition for its two-value syntax and supports `repeat-x` and `repeat-y` as keywords. The logical keywords `repeat-block` and `repeat-inline` are added to complement the existing keywords and there isn't a conflict in `var()` usage or CSSOM. Just in case we add a way to change how the two-value syntax should be interpreted, we run into the issues you refer to. Or is there something I am missing? (Note that I turned `background-repeat` into a shorthand in #9756 and added the logical keywords for it now in #10755.) Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/116#issuecomment-2295403499 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 18 August 2024 21:39:34 UTC