- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2024 23:15:42 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I agree that option 2 is the most author-friendly. I think it's compatible with *also* doing 1 in the future if we find that reasonable. We could either make option 2 use the same property we expect to use for option 1, but with a specialized keyword, or do a separate property and define the interaction (probably: it's inert if either property calls it inert). I lean slightly towards the separate property, just because it groups the functionality slightly better with the associated functionality of overflow, and reads slightly better imo. (I can't come up with a good keyword that would real well in a general `interactivity` property.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10711#issuecomment-2276867696 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2024 23:15:43 UTC