- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2024 23:04:30 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@emilio I'm not sure I understand the confusion. You have two entirely separate subtrees, both rooted in the same element; the two syntaxes match against one or the other. It seems unremarkable to me that they would do different things, because that's what happens *for every other possible selector as well*: normal selectors match against the shadow tree (which is where the stylesheet in question lives, so that's exactly what you'd expect), and `:host(...)` arguments match against the light tree. @sorvell > Do you think it makes sense to support :host:empty as well? Hm, yeah, that's workable under the same argument (it's only matching based on the non-host contents of the shadow, which are under the stylesheet author's control). It's only different from `:host:has(*)` in the case that the shadow contains text nodes but no elements, tho. Not sure it's particularly *useful* - it seems a lot more likely that that component knows whether it's put anything inside the shadow tree, and in particular, a `<style>` in the shadow would prevent it from matching, but there are ways to attach stylesheets without inserting nodes, so I guess it's reasonable... -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10693#issuecomment-2276845774 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2024 23:04:31 UTC