Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade-6] Specificity of Implicitly-Added `:scope` in Scoped Rules (#10196)

• From: andruud via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
• Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 09:05:47 +0000
• To: public-css-archive@w3.org
• Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-2066149892-1713517546-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

I would expect the `&` to have its regular "as if :is()"-specificity behavior, which in this case means the specificity of `:is(:scope)`.

..... which means Chrome doesn't do what I expect.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by andruud
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10196#issuecomment-2066149892 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 19 April 2024 09:05:48 UTC